US attorney general, Jeff Sessions said that the visa ban is not against any religion, it’s about national security.
A United States appeals court backed a decision halting President Donald Trump’s revised executive order enforcing a travel ban on six Muslim-majority nations.
“President Trump knows that the country he has been elected to lead is threatened daily by terrorists who believe in a radical ideology and that there are active plots to infiltrate the US immigration system - just as occurred prior to 9/11,” Sessions said in a statement yesterday.
The bench had consistently ruled against the ban, saying the executive order signed by Trump “exceeded the scope of the authority delegated to him by Congress” to inspect immigration.
“The President is committed to protecting the American people and our national security, and we are proud to support his mission to put America first by defending his right to keep us safe,” Sessions said, adding : “This is the reason why the department of justice will continue to seek further review by the Supreme Court.”
Sessions said the president’s executive order is “well within his lawful authority to keep the nation safe”.
“We disagree with the Ninth Circuit’s decision to block that authority,” he said.
“Certain countries shelter or sponsor terrorist groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and we may be unable to obtain any reliable background information on individuals from these war-torn, failed states,” he said.
Sessions cautioned against placing “our nation at risk until we have the have the ability accurately and responsibly to vet those seeking entry here”.
“The president was clear in his landmark speech in Saudi Arabia: this is not about religion; it is about national security. In fact, he called upon leaders in the Muslim world to join the United States in protecting religious freedom for all, including the freedom to be free from violence and terror,” Sessions said.
He said that the executive branch is assigned with the responsibility to keep the country safe under Article II of the Constitution but “unfortunately, this injunction prevents him from fully carrying out his Article II duties and has a chilling effect on security operations overall.”